About  
Since 2003, Free Will has been a resource for libertarian conservative news, analysis, and sarcasm.

Born and raised in Southern Illinois, Aaron escaped the Chicago Democrats in 2005 and now resides in upstate New York, where he develops software, studies economics, and listens to the music of Rush.

Email Aaron.
  Search  
  Friends of the Blog  

Made In America
From Scottish Parts
Looting Leads to Violence, Violence Leads to the Dark Side
4:03 am, 9/2/05
Looting Leads to Violence, Violence Leads to the Dark Side

The Canadians are on the ground trying to help in New Orleans, and as I've been trying to explain to people, have found that there is nothing that can be done now:
A Canadian search and rescue team in Louisiana says conditions on the ground are so dangerous, it has to wait for order to restore before they can get to work in the devastated hurricane region.

"It's far too dangerous for even the state troopers and police to wander out," said USAR member Brian Inglis in a statement Thursday on his team website, vancouver.ca/usar.

"It's absolutely crazy, the devastation is unreal -- the gunfire, the shooting, the looting is like something you see in a movie. "

Despite the 35° C heat and 98 per cent humidity, [Inglis] said they're equipped with water, and some "good ol' Louisiana cooking the locals have cooked up for the police officers and ourselves."
Ain't that nice. The situation is so bad at this point that many New Orleans police officers are turning in their badges and leaving the city, saying that the city that they're supposed to serve and protect doesn't exist anymore. I've even heard that survivors taken to shelters in Baton Rouge have gotten loose and are looting there, as well. This article claims those rumors are false, but another says that community leaders are asking the state to stop the flow of survivors and state legislators are demanding that the Governor establish a military presence in Baton Rouge. What I do know for a fact is that no transportation company in America seems willing to go in there.

So how did Louisiana turn into a Batman movie? Yesterday, I didn't feel too comfortable placing blame just yet, but now I'm starting to see a pattern.
"I do want to tell you what angers me the most," Blanco said. "Usually, disasters bring out the best in people. Now we've got people that it's bringing out the worst in. We will restore law and order ... I am just furious. Louisianans are too good, too strong, too wonderful and too noble for our reputation to be destroyed by this criminal element. We will take them off the street."
She was just furious? Something tells me that Blanco was living in something of an alternate universe if she didn't believe that the criminal underground rises up to take over society in the absence of authority. She thought that being surrounded by rotting corpses usually brings out the best in people? Does Blanco even read newspapers? Did she forget about the horrors in the aftermath on the tsunami?

Blanco is, however, legitimately pissed at having her preconceptions about society shattered, and has finally pushed for a rather firm response:
"Three hundred of the Arkansas National Guard have landed in the city of New Orleans," Ms Blanco said.

"These troops are fresh back from Iraq, well trained, experienced, battle tested and under my orders to restore order in the streets.

"They have M-16s and they are locked and loaded.

"These troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will."
Blanco then stormed out of the room without taking questions. Bring on the pain, Governor Blanco. This is the only sane response, but it should've been organized days ago. This is definitely not a "hindsight is 20/20" issue like the handling of the evacuation, but rather common sense. I can understand Nagin's reasoning about ignoring the looters in order to get people out: New Orleans, as a coherent jurisdiction, is really irrelevant right now, the city cops are supposed to serve and protect is nonexistant. Nagin, however, apparently was rather naive about (or perhaps entirely resigned to) the nature of the criminal element, and never saw it coming (or perhaps couldn't get the state leadership to care) that violent gangs would actually take over the city and begin attacking rescue workers and survivors, disrupting rescue operations and dragging out the survival situation for thousands.

What this means for the evacuation effort, I'm not entirely sure. There are a lot of people in the city who still don't "get it" and think that FEMA is going to drop them tents. It ain't happening, because there's no way to sustain a population of survivors in those conditions. Tens of thousands are scattered across a major metropolitan area, and the one thing they probably absolutely need right now is fresh water to sustain them long enough for us to get them out. It was obviously not part of the original plan for it to take so long that they would have to bring in water, or, in fact, to have 100,000 people to deal with: A huge proportion of the people who stayed behind stayed behind because they simply didn't take hurricanes seriously. Either way, that's where we are now. I have no idea how we would go about door-to-door delivery of tens of thousands of gallons per day of fresh water, and frankly, I doubt it's really possible at all. Attempting bulk airdrops would create a water war as the gangs took over the water supplies and kept it for themselves or blackmailed the survivors with it.

Three hundred troops, combined with the forces already committed to the area and what remains of the New Orleans police department can probably secure the Superdome and the surrounding area, but I'm concerned that it's going to take much longer to restore order in the rest of the city, and people just can't do without water that long. If they start drinking the filth around them (and some probably already are), this problem is going to get a lot larger, fast.

There are some rather obvious mistakes here to learn from for future reference, and Blanco's comments give a rather alarming insight into how local leaders apparently imagined this would go down and that they may have not fully realized the nature of what was about to happen to them. Nagin has appeared to be walking through this entire thing in a daze (finally coming to life when he found out the first attempt at plugging the levee had been abandoned to put the helicopters on SAR, probably the one thing he shouldn't have been upset about), and you may recall Blanco's apparent tearful, shocked response when she found out that the Superdome was doing without power, toilets, and A/C. We knew this a day before the storm, but she didn't know until someone brought her inside to see the survivors?

I don't really see a reason to crucify anybody at this point, their evacuation plan rescued the vast majority of the city and perhaps as many as would leave when given the chance, but this is an error large enough that, well, I don't think we'll see Nagin's picture hanging up next to Giuliani's any time soon.

Update: Instapundit and an Instapundit reader's comments.
Katrina tells us that nature is more powerful than any of us mere mortals can comprehend. But still, mere mortals do the best they can-as an emergency management type in a small rural Washington state county, I don't see any thing else that could have been done. In short, the local officials did a brilliant job in evacuating a major city within 30 hours. They established a location people could go to so they wouldn't die in flood waters. And the response thus far has been magnificent-is there looting: yes; are there other infirmaties of human nature? Of course-but let no one doubt, the response to this major natural disaster has been superb. And small nitpicking critics will cavil and snipe-but consider what might have been.
Well, it could have been worse, certainly. I do think that a firmer hand with looters early on, in line with "broken windows" theory, might have forestalled the more egregious lawlessness we're seeing now. But this is a natural disaster without parallel in American history -- like the Chicago Fire if it had spread across three states -- and disaster relief isn't like calling Domino's. Nor does the fact that we're Americans somehow offer supernatural protection from the consequences of a calamity like this.

Bridges are out, roads are blocked, boats are sunk, and all sorts of other infrastructure is down. Aid can't get through in quantity until that's fixed, at least somewhat. In a situation like this, the first week you get a trickle, the second week you get enough, and the third week you get pretty much all you want. We're still in week one. That, as I've noted elsewhere, is why the standard disaster-preparation advice is to have enough food and water to get you through a week on your own.
Absolutely, and in fact that's exactly what I wrote before. If you don't have, at the very least, a bugout kit in your trunk, it's not rational to be surprised when you have to bug out and find yourself totally screwed. If you don't have a bugout kit and live in, for example, a giant washbasin, you're on borrowed time, and New Orleans is now the case study for that concept. There appear to be a lot of people who didn't even try to prepare for a disaster they all had been told was coming for a generation (then were told, point blank, 24 hours in advance, was now imminent) because they imagined that FEMA or the State of Louisiana had magical powers to save them, and it just doesn't work like that.

That said, the lawlessness issue is one that could potentially alter the scale of this catastrophe by an order of magnitude. There are tens of thousands of people in Mogadishu-on-the-Mississippi, and they should be getting out now, not next week. Relief teams should be able to work safely to try to get these people water and a bite to eat. Helicopters should be able to drop supplies to hospitals and pick up stranged New Orleaners without being shot at or without being accosted by an armed mob on the landing pad threatening to turn Black Hawk Down on them. Hopefully, the roving bands of gangers won't cost many of these people their lives, but because it could, it's an error in judgement that needs to be highlighted both for consideration in our response to this situation, and for consideration in planning our methods of responding to future catastrophes of this kind. Because there will be another, someday, and while we can be glad that what might have been wasn't, every person we can pull out alive is one little victory.

Update: Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks Governor Blanco was asleep at the wheel.
"What disgusts me is the way Louisiana government seems to have reacted by way of paralysis--do nothing and hope the Feds take over quickly."

"The govenor of LA should be tressed and hung over the stadium."

"I knew the Louisiana government was in way over its head and that their incompetence was going to cost lots of lives when in the very first press conference, they said they had things under control with their local search and rescue units and the Coast Guard rescue helicopters. I did the math based on their rough estimates, assuming a 20 minute round trip, and figured they would be rescuing the last person sometime in February. 2008."

"Simple solution- disaster occurs, big disaster. Someone takes overall charge who has overall control over the things that help during a disaster. Lets call this person a 'national disaster coordinator'."
"the 'coordinator' position you're describing exists -- it's called the governor."
"You mean the Governor?"
I, uh, wouldn't go so far as to the "hanged from the Superdome" bit, but there's a reason that the main thing the federal government does to relieve disasters is give money to the states affected. It's because the states are supposed to decide how to spend it.

Unfortunately, this kind of "it's everyone's job but mine" buck-passing bureacrophilia is the kind of crap that happens when you start blurring responsibilities by creating federal agencies to take over things that the federal government has no business fiddling with in the first place, like education and disaster management. I won't name names.

Seriously, though. I hope Blanco took the last night to get her head together.

Update: A lot of gunfire, footage on FOX News of gangs riding around in pickup trucks waving rifles, chased by convoys of (cops? soldiers?) in black Dodge Rams. Some fires have broken out with little water pressure to put them out and a chemical plant exploded sometime this morning.

More troops are moving in, ordered up from active duty by Washington, and people are now being evacuated straight to one of the New Orleans airports, numerous choppers, including heavier Chinooks, flying over.

Update: Jeez, finally, lady.
Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco has requisitioned school buses throughout the state to help evacuate people from New Orleans.

The governor ordered all school superintendents to work with local law enforcement to provide at least one peace officer to ride in each bus and two marked patrol cars to accompany every 10 buses.
Wow, troops and buses? Good morning, Governor. Glad you could join us.

It appears, as well, that there are now so many evacuees in Baton Rouge that the population of the city has almost doubled, from about 250,000 to over 415,000.

Update: FOX News has footage of a major amphibuous freight convoy rolling into the Superdome with food and supplies, at least a half dozen helicopters setting down on the upper deck. Another is crossing through much higher water from Jefferson parish. The buses are coming back in now that the National Guard has cracked down, and airliners are coming in to evacuate from the airport. Now they can reestablish some infrastructure to ramp up operations. This is the big step forward.
New Orleans  
Comment (15)
at 04:48 AM, 9/2/05

In the long term, it's possible that this will help clean up the NO police department. Those officers quitting now are largely in it for themselves. Those who stick are professionals, and less likely to be corrupt. A sort of Darwin approach, as it were.
at 09:04 AM, 9/2/05

The Mayor failed the city. Not hard to strap loud speakers to helicopters and tell people to head to the superdome, not hard to tell fema the convention center is a rally point (which they didn't, FEMA found out from the news).

Looting should've been dealt with harshly from the get-go. You shoot the first looter with a TV and the 2nd and 3rd think about things a bit harder.

The press has been irresponsible with their reporting - looking for controversy everywhere. Why arn't there more NG troops, where are the buses etc. There's no gasoline... where are 1000 buses going to fill up at? You can't send in troops without providing a basic infrastructure for them - or the troops will become part of the problem. The disaster folks are feeding the people at the superdome.

What could've been done is this - trailers with potable water could've been airlifted to various parts of the city - highway over passes, streets etc. - the cops should have been directing people to the superdome - it should've been put out over and over again that the superdome is the Rally point - and everyone must go there.
at 09:12 AM, 9/2/05

I think the one benefit from this is that in the future when people are warned to evacuate from anything, they may take it more seriously. I know that I will.
at 09:16 AM, 9/2/05

The majority of the criticism for the lack of response should fall directly at the feet of Mayor Nagin. For a city that was one storm away from total destruction, they were ill prepared, and unresponsive. This guy is clueless! Talk about spinning wheels?!?
at 09:47 AM, 9/2/05

The sad truth is that for decades the people of Loisiana and especially New Orleans have been electing a collection of crooks, fools, and cynics to run their state. Ha-ha-ha--What a joke, right? Let the good times roll, etc. There isn't another city or state in the country that would let a sword of Damocles the size of the Mississippi, Lake P, and the Gulf looming over them behind 15-foot walls and not make keeping that water out their priority to the exclusion of anything else at anytime. Yet the governor, state leg, the senators, the reps, etc., could hardly be bothered to do anything but whine about the Fed gov not giving enough to the Corps of E.

Baby, when its the lives of hundreds of thousands of citizens, you don't wait around for 40 or 50 years hoping somebody else does something for you.

The last chance was thrown away less than a year ago when--for what? A cheap laugh for the rest of the country?--the LA voters elected an inept political hack over the most competent politician Lousiana has ever produced, Bobby Jindal, because he had a funny name or his skin was too dark or maybe because it was just too obviously the clearcut sensible choice. Any other state in the union--yes, even Mississipi--would give anything for a man like that.

How many lives have been lost because LA's gov was an old, overwhelmed, inept administrator rather than a confident, young, dynamic, and creative leader?

I'm determined to do everything I can to help these poor people, but they have done nothing to help themselves for years and years now. A lesson for all of us, me included, I might add.
Lou Minatti at 12:24 PM, 9/2/05

Nagin is playing CYA this morning. Nagin is now blaming President Bush for his own incompetence. Nagin didn't order mandatory evacuation until 12 hours before the storm hit. His incompetence meant that thousands of people couldn't get out.
at 12:51 PM, 9/2/05

Something has occured to me as I think on the attitude of the press corps to the lawlessness and violence that has come about in the wake of Katrina.

Remember how, in the wake of 9/11, we heard so much eulogizing about how the firefighters and police officers, and even the civilian victims themselves (all of whom, let's keep in mind, had no idea the towers were going to fall), were "heroes," "America's Bravest," and all the rest of it? I found it kind of irritating and disingenious to suggest that people doing nothing more than their jobs, knowingly exposing themselves to no more risk than they should reasonably expect (whether in the case of firefighters or office workers), are suddenly "heroes" and "our very bravest" because they had the singular bad luck to have a building startlingly fall on them. That's being in the wrong place at the wrong time, not being a hero. Heroism is exposing yourself to an unreasonable, atypical amount of danger for the sake of doing good for another. None of these people knew that they were going to die, they were just doing thier ordinary jobs. Why does it matter? Well, if you abuse terms like "heroism" and "bravery," then what words do you use when real heroism and bravery manifest themselves? Uber-heroism? Mega-bravery? There is a real danger in allowing words to be co-opted this way.

To get back to Katrina, and how the lawlessness in New Orleans is related to the 9/11 attacks, I've noticed that every mention of rescue workers of any type (be they firefighters, police, or even the military para-rescue jumpers) being shot at always ends with some statement to the effect that "therefore, they had to pull out." Notice I said, "shot at," not "shot." So far, I have only heard one report of someone (a police officer) actually being shot. In some cases when I've heard reports like this, they actually explicitly state that they "had to" leave people to die because the risk to the rescue workers was just "too great."

Now, please believe me, I have the greatest respect for people who devote themselves to helping others. It is certainly noble work, and I don't intend to denigrate their efforts however far they do or do not go. Every person is free to choose how much risk they think is reasonable to expose themselves to.

But, having said that, there is something a bit disappointing, not to mention incongruous about the selfsame firefighters and police officers who basked in the borrowed glory of thier "fallen comrades" after 9/11, who even now proudly wear their "FDNY" t-shirts and accept the newfound respect the citizenry have for ALL rescue-workers' "bravery" finding a gunshot or two (or even a couple of hundred) "too much" risk to bear when lives are at stake. I'm not suggesting any action or approbation should fall on these people for not taking extraordinary measures, remember. I'm simply saying that for all the talk of "heroes" in fire departments and rescue agencies after 9/11, I've seen precious little real heroism manifest itself in the wake of this tragedy. If heroism is defined as going above and beyond the call of duty to help those in need, as I believe it used to be, then one would hope that more people devoting themselves to this type of work would jump at the chance to show what kind of devotion to duty they're capable of-- not shrink from the first sign of unusual risk as a reasonable excuse to leave people to thier fate.

After 9/11 I was disappointed to hear certain terms be so abused (like "tragedy" itself-- tragedies are unpreventable events, like Katrina; attacks are a crime, not a tragedy), but I sincerely hoped that the emotions and thoughts we all had after 9/11 would inspire people to do and be even more whenever unusually trying circumstances presented themselves in the future. I'm saddened to see that apparently, that has not happened.
SourMash at 01:46 PM, 9/2/05

Could someone please help me explain some of this to my co-workers?

They think Nagin is a hero because he spoke out and told the truth that it's Bush's fault for not acting faster!

If Bush had walked into the water himself and carried out a child in each arm, these folks would ask why he had not strapped an elderly person to his back while he was at it!

Where is this mentality coming from -- that it is the Federal Government's job to protect you from nature, from disaster, from hunger, from looters, and even from the poor planning of either your local government or yourself?
61north at 02:01 PM, 9/2/05

There will be plenty of blame to go around, but there are also plenty of heroes. That New Orleans would eventually be flooded was inevitable. That the local government failed miserably to adequately plan for this eventually is also obvious.

But there are heroes. Many of these heroes haven't been heard from yet because they are still in there working their a**es off. Once things settle down the stories will start to come out.

Last night on the news I saw a nurse working at the Convention Center. She was the only medical person there to serve thousands of people by herself. She had been there for days and been working nonstop throughout gunshots, riots, and murders doing the best she could. She's a hero. And there will be hundreds more stories like hers.
at 06:52 PM, 9/2/05

The points raised by SourMash and 61north bring into sharper focus what the real Libertarian issue is in this whole mess. I am annoyed at the way the press uses language at a time like this; that is the main thing I talked about before-- but the real heart of what's going on there is this: real heroism, and real responsibility, come from individuals, not Daddy Government.

61north rightly pointed out that there are plenty of heroes doing heroic deeds right now, and we likely will not hear those stories until much later. SourMash is frustrated with his coworkers' mistunderstanding of where responsibility to do things actually lies at a time like this.

In both cases, it is individuals showing the rugged capability and 'can do' attitude that characterizes free Americans that are the real inspiration at times like these. While goverment officials "build the capability" to help, FEMA fumbles with press conferences and secures funding, and agents of the government run from gunfire, it is individual citizens who are actually out there on the streets, doing what they can to protect, to help, to save one another.

Just like in the L.A. riots of the early 90's, the government pleads, through the press, for us "not to take matters into our own hands"-- let them handle it. But it was the owners of stores who stood on top of them with firearms and protected their property from looters at that time; a time when the police were clustered at headquaters refusing to enter the "too dangerous" riot zone, and the National Guard was walking around with empty rifles. Here, too, I have heard FEMA and DHS officials say that individuals should not attempt to do anything about what they see going on-- as day after day passes without the government's agents doing anything about it, either.

Just like when it comes to personal protection in the everyday sense of the word, the government would have us do nothing, and wait for them to act-- even when they act incompetently, or not at all-- rather than help ourselves. Why? Because they have "training," and we do not. But it was individuals, taking upon themselves, who we saw capably direct traffic after 9/11, not agents of the government-- and they did a fine job, without any training at all. How is that? Well, some things are simply not rocket science. I would say your average intelligent American can figure out how to direct traffic, stop a looter, help someone rope down from a rooftop, save someone from drowning, without any training of any kind, and on thier first attempt.

It's important to remember that no matter how much "training" anyone has, they're still only people, just like you and I. And in the most dire of circumstances, it is physical presence and the wherewithal to act that really counts-- not what you learned to do in vocational classes. The government rarely, if ever, does anything better than the private sector-- should it be any different during a natural disaster?

(for more on the resiliency of average people in crises, I highly recommend the article on Reason's webpage about the trauma industry's reaction to 9/11, at http://www.reason.com/0508/fe.ss.the.shtml)
at 08:45 PM, 9/2/05

...joker's to the left of me, clowns to the right....bush should resign. Peace
Aaron at 08:53 PM, 9/2/05

So Imhotep, did the "Aske Nazi" cause the hurricane?
at 09:58 PM, 9/2/05

Check out the New Orleans emergency plan posted at: http://www.cityofno.com/portal.aspx?portal=46&tabid=26 and compare it to what actually happened. The plan calls for a mandatory evacuation of NO beginning 72 hours before a force 3 hurricane is expected to strike the city.
Christopher Kallini at 10:45 PM, 9/2/05

There goes Imhotep's Leftist Tourette's again...
at 08:52 AM, 9/3/05

The ashkenazi. There actually are groups and people who claim that Katrina was God's punishment on the US because we assisted Sharon evacuate the Gaza. See The Middle East Media Research Organization(MEMRI) and Anti-War.com. Peace
Comment Policy: Irrelevant or obscene posts, including ad hominem attacks, SPAM, crazed ranting, and threats of violence may be removed at the owner of this site's discretion.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

  Advertisers  
  Free Will Stuff  
  Reading Material